Review the original February–July 2026 Section 122 surcharge, its July 24 endpoint, historical exceptions and the separate current-duty review path.
Proclamation 11012 imposed an original 10% Section 122 surcharge for a stated period beginning February 24 and ending July 24, 2026. That original window is now past. Do not carry its rate into a current shipment automatically: later measures require their own legal sources, dates and exception checks.
Reported under HTS heading 9903.03.01 for covered entries.
12:01 a.m. EDT, unless ended earlier or lawfully extended.
The proclamation says legislation is required beyond 150 days.
Original 2026 surcharge period
Use the original proclamation for historical entries. A new shipment needs current legal sources and product-level review.
Proclamation 11012 stated July 24, 2026 at 12:01 a.m. EDT as the endpoint.
Continuation beyond the original 150-day period requires an Act of Congress under the proclamation; do not infer it from a headline.
The July forced-labor Section 301 action and product-specific duties must be reviewed on their own terms.
Editorial update: October 9, 2026. This panel describes the original proclamation window, not a complete determination of later legal actions.
Subscribe for source-linked policy updates. A notification does not replace product-specific filing review.
Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
$29/month · Up to 10 watches
Get an email when an official-source fingerprint changes, with retrieval context and a review item in your workspace. A signal is not a legal determination.
Set up a tariff change watch| Fact | Value |
|---|---|
| Legal basis | Trade Act of 1974, Section 122 |
| Authorizing statute | 19 U.S.C. § 2132 |
| Original additional rate | 10% ad valorem under HTS heading 9903.03.01 |
| Entry window | February 24, 2026 through 12:01 a.m. EDT on July 24, 2026 |
| Extension beyond 150 days | Requires an Act of Congress |
| How to model the 10% | Separate additional-duty layer; do not merge into MFN base duty |
| Important non-stacking rule | Do not add Section 122 to the portion already subject to Section 232 duty |
The original proclamation set a finite entry window. Its 10% rate is a historical reference, not a default for October shipments. Any continuation or replacement requires a separate controlling source; different tariff authorities must not be treated as one program.
For entries in the original period, verify Chapter 99 coverage and the proclamation exceptions, including specified products, Section 232 treatment and qualifying preference entries. An exception to that surcharge does not by itself remove an antidumping duty or another separate measure.
Save the entry date and time, HTS classification, origin, customs value and original filing instructions when reviewing a historical estimate. For a new shipment, begin with current applicable programs rather than copying the old 10% assumption.
Planning-only notice: TariffsChart is not a customs broker, law firm, tax advisor, or government authority. Verify classifications, rates, effective dates, exclusions, and filing instructions with official sources and qualified professionals.
Proclamation 11012 stated an endpoint of 12:01 a.m. EDT on July 24, 2026. The original period is past; later measures require separate legal and entry-date review.
No. Do not continue a historical assumption without an applicable current legal source. Check product scope, origin, entry date and other tariff programs.
No. MFN duty, China Section 301 lists, the separate forced-labor Section 301 action, Section 232 and AD/CVD each require their own review.
